Talk:Satpanth

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force.

Dear Sir,

Information provided on the page is not totally correct. Infact Satpanth is "TRUE PATH" and it is followed by both the Hindus and Muslims. Hindu followers are called as Hindu Satpanthi while Muslim Followers are called Muslim Satpanthi. Therefore it is very important to mention in this article at the begining about the meading of Satpanth and it is followed by both Hindu and Muslim. The current article mentions only about Muslims which will impact largely on the Hindu Community. Please also visit http://www.satpanth.org/ which is the website for Hindu Satpanthi. For your more information, the place where these Hindu Satpanthi follow have been awarded as Jagatguru Peeth by Hindu Sant Samiti which is the topmost recognisition for any Hindu Community. Hindu Sant Samiti is the Apex body of all the leaders of Hindu Dharma and their recognistion is very important for any Hindu Community.

So, I request you to make necessary changes in the above article.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kutchipatel (talk • contribs) 07:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

This is in continuation with the following topic and would like to update you that as today 10th June 2010 10.10am (IST) I have notice that on serach of word "Satpanth" , wikipidia is again came back to its origina and correct article.

Since last few days this type of hide and seek game is going on which you please make a note of it.

Thanks Pradeep Nathani —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradeepnathani (talk • contribs) 04:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 122.168.241.149, 5 May 2010[edit]

Dear Sir,

With reference to my following observation, again I very humbly would like to bring to your notice that still on search of word "Satpanth" still some one is putting wrong information, and same is apparing as off now (9th June 2010, 9.25pm (IST).

Please look in to the matter and do the needful.

In case you need any more clarification on above topics I am happy to provide the same. My contact details are as follows.

Pradeep D. Nathani —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradeepnathani (talk • contribs) 15:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{editsemiprotected}} Dear Sir,

I very humbly would like to bring to your kind notice that in wikipedia, when we search on word "Satpanth" and result of aboove search is getting changed since last few days.

I have notice on 8th June 2010.

Summary of "Satpanth" search is as follows.

1) Earlier information available on "Satpanth" search was correct. 2) when I have given search on word "Satpanth" on 8th JUne 2010 at around 8.30 pm(IST)I found result was some thing different, it was not correct. 3) Again on 9th June 2010 search on word "Satpanth" at 10.00am(IST) gave me the correct.

With this, above type of constant changes happening on the result of word "Satpanth" I would like to bring to your notice that some one is adding/edinting/deleting the correct information and putting wrong information on it.

By doing this it is going to have a big impact on our entire community, its image,goodwill etc.

As off now also I found that, search of "Kutchh Kadva Patidar" the following result.

Kuttch Kadva Patidar, (also variously spelled Kadwa, Kadva), are a sub-caste of the Patidar community in India. Most of Kutch Kadva Patidars are Satpanthi's

Herein above marked line I would like to inform you that Most of Kutch Kadva Patidar are Santani's and not Satpanthi's. To be more precise more than 95% are belonging to Sanatani which please make a note of this point.

The above is a huge difference on meaning and it has a huge impact on our community, its good will etc.

I very humbly request you to look into the matter and do the needful.

Please feel free to contact me for the above matter. -- Thanks & Regards

Pradeep Nathani

122.168.241.149 (talk) 13:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blank request. Chzz ► 13:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Not done[reply]

Some corrections[edit]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Dear Sir,

Information provided on the page is not totally correct. Infact Satpanth is "TRUE PATH" and it is followed by both the Hindus and Muslims. Hindu followers are called as Hindu Satpanthi while Muslim Followers are called Muslim Satpanthi. Therefore it is very important to mention in this article at the begining about the meading of Satpanth and it is followed by both Hindu and Muslim. The current article mentions only about Muslims which will impact largely on the Hindu Community. Please also visit http://www.satpanth.org/ which is the website for Hindu Satpanthi. For your more information, the place where these Hindu Satpanthi follow have been awarded as Jagatguru Peeth by Hindu Sant Samiti which is the topmost recognisition for any Hindu Community. Hindu Sant Samiti is the Apex body of all the leaders of Hindu Dharma and their recognistion is very important for any Hindu Community.

So, I request you to make necessary changes in the above article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kutchipatel (talk • contribs) 13:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: History Of The Ismailis, Tajddin Sadiq Ali, Mumtaz-Ali, 1998. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 17:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]