This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
It sure smells like a copyvio to me. You have to be a little careful with copyvio claims, as I've found Wikimedia content (not just Wikipedia) that has been reproduced elsewhere and then had copyright asserted as if it were to be the original source. In this case, owing to the few number of edits and all of the edits having happened in a short period of time, it certainly seems more likely that this was not the creation of an editor who took the time to come up with original wording in the first place or spent the effort to craft this article, as a legitimately written article on Wikipedia usually goes through. --Robert Horning (talk) 12:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]