Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

It would be nice to add SAR ratings to the comparison table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.103.191.34 (talk) 12:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note 10.1 sections[edit]

need to merge the now-separate Galaxy Note 10.1 sections. AND the Note 10.1 2014 edition should not have a separate article. Ken (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is already in Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition so there is no need to open another talk with the same content JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
feeling a bit touchy, Jerome? Discussed here since they (so far) 2 separate articles.Ken (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly im just following wikipedia rules Ken that talks in the same topic whether in what talk page it is located as long as it is the concern of that talk page is fine though posting the same concern on another talk page must be avoided at all cost JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KLWhitehead, your "feeling a bit touchy" comment wasn't really necessary, given that Jeromesandilanico is being civil in his disagreement. I'm not a part of this dispute and don't particularly mind if the articles are merged or not, but if this page is part of the merge proposal at Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition, then it's best to keep the discussion in one place. Acalamari 09:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

64GB storage[edit]

Under comparisson you list that there are devices with 64GB memory? I doubt that they exist in reality.--78.48.168.223 (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Note 7R and Note 8[edit]

I noticed that there is literally no information on the Note 7R or Note FE whatever they are calling it or the Note 8. There should be enough information about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2370:11A0:18E4:4FB9:4A3C:C2C3 (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note 7[edit]

I noticed that the Note 7 is missing from the comparison table. Is there a reason for this? Bindydad123 (talk) 13:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phablets vs tablets in contexts[edit]

If we use phablets in the body of the article (Comparison table) I suppose we should change from tablets to phablets in contents for uniformity. What are your thoughts?

Comparison Chart inconsistent[edit]

Just want to mention that the comparison chart is not super clear. Note 8/9 have support for USB-C Video output, so would that count as HDMI connectivity? The Note4 uses MHL which is using the USB port to output an HDMI signal... OTG is a specification that uses Mini/Micro USB2 plugs with an extra pin to select host mode. USB-C uses a different specification and does not support OTG on newer devices. Older phone models list GLONASS as a sensor type, but newer models also have GLONASS but is not specified in the chart.

I don't have a good idea for how to improve this chart but I wanted to leave a note for anyone who is better at editing.

Regarding the proposed split[edit]

Someone has recently suggested moving the comparison table over to Comparison_of_Samsung_Galaxy_Note_smartphones, which I presume is for consistency with the comparison of Samsung Galaxy S smartphones.

But please note that this section is not limited to mobile phones, but also contains Note Tablets. ---84.147.37.189 (talk) 02:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]