Talk:Sam Graves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Goth subculture" grant[edit]

I've removed the following paragraph from the article, and wanted to explain my reasoning:

"According to the Associated Press, Graves wasted nearly half of a $273,000 US Grant for spending on urban youth programs in his district on curbing gothic subculture in Blue Springs, Missouri in 2002.[10] Graves sought to spend $118,000 of that money for therapy, assessment and case management, as well as a series of town meetings to discuss the issue. But because there was not enough interest, Graves' project shifted from Goths to counterculture and negative influences."
The text of the reference can be found here

The problems with this paragraph are:

  • The reference makes clear the grant was overseen by Blue Springs City Administration, not Graves. Blue Springs applied for and received the grant, discovered the problem wasn't what they perceived it was, and reallocated/returned the funds. That may well be embarrassing, but if so its principally an embarassment for the City which made the decisions.
  • There's an undue weight issue in including this much detail on what was at best a minor political controversy, in an article of this overall length. If the Graves article was twenty pages long and detailed everything he's ever said or done, there might be a place for a single sentence on this grant. Or, if Graves was famous for campaigning against Goths, or the grant had been a centrepiece of his election campaign, or anything similar, it may be notable enough for inclusion. As is, a minor scandal in which he was tangentially involved is not deserving of this much (or really any) detail.

Other opinions welcome, and please note this is not about removing "criticism", just trivia. What we really need is more detail of Graves' voting record, stances on major isuses, that kind of thing. Gun ownership, abortion, the environment, taxes, religion, and so on and on. Euryalus (talk) 22:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sam Graves, Official Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Sam Graves, Official Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sam Graves, Official Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sam Graves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

guhaaaaa

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sam Graves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian Conflict[edit]

Why isn’t anything being done to descalate the situation in Ukraine? Sending billions of dollars of taxpayer money and tanks and aircraft is not the answer and everyone knows it. The United States seems to be trying to stoke the fire at the cost of a nuclear catastrophe. The only voice American citizens have is through people like you. Please do the best you can to help the dire situation. Thank you 136.35.162.87 (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]