Talk:Salisbury railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 21 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure). SST flyer 02:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salisbury railway station → Salisbury railway station (Wiltshire) – This doesn't appear to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term over the three others of the same name: Salisbury railway station, Adelaide, Salisbury railway station, Brisbane, and Salisbury station (North Carolina). The proposed title seems to be the preferred disambiguation per WP:UKSTATION based on recent RMs such as this, but others may be available. The bottom line is that Salisbury railway station ought to redirect to the dab page. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the other stations appear to be considerably smaller, less used and less well known than this one, particularly the North Carolina one which only appears to get 4 trains a day? The Brisbane example appears to only get 8 trains a day, if I'm reading that correctly, while the Adelaide example seems to have a roughly half hourly frequency. The Wiltshire station however, looking at live departures seems to have 8 departures over the next hour for example. While the number of trains isn't everything, it's actually a fairly good guide on how major the stations are. Jeni ^(talk) 16:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note on usage The UK station is used by 1.9 million people, while the US version is only used by 31,539. Can't find stats on actual usage for the ozzy versions, however judging by the amount of trains serving them I'll be surprised if they come anywhere near. Jeni ^(talk) 16:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. All my searches point to the UK station being the primary topic for this title, even when logged out, using the South African google and excluding Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What they said. Plus, the last station move wrecked incoming links. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per everyone above - The UK one's Primary by far. –Davey2010^Talk 20:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Planning on taking new pictures for this article[edit]

I'm planning on taking new pictures for this article since the current ones are outdated and only seem to get good pictures on the outside of the station, Anyone against this please say. SageWater (talk) 14:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, a fresh view is always welcome. If you upload them to Wikimedia Commons then they will be easy to find for other appropriate articles and projects. Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]