Talk:Saint Louis Priory School

Angry Birds

Were Priory Alumni really involved in Roxio's angry birds? Someone confirm, in the meantime I'm taking it down. vmantva 14:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposal Regarding Notable Alumni

It seems that the 'notable alumni' section here is getting changed pretty often. Perhaps a good yardstick of whether an alum is 'notable' is the existence of a Wikipedia entry specifically dedicated to that person, and only then if it's been up for six months or more. These 'vanity edits' that pop up from time to time just make Priory look bad.

• I think we do need to tighten our concept of what makes an alumnus notable. The inclusion of Andrew Schlafly makes me question the seriousness of this article. Priory has among its alumni a host of lawyers and sons of famous people - these really aren't "notable" qualities. Perhaps the founding of Conservapedia merits him the recognition, however I personally consider this a black mark against Priory's legacy... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frenellation (talk • contribs) 18:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Prioryshield.jpg

Image:Prioryshield.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Enrollment Twice

Am I the only one for whom enrollment shows up twice in the infobox. It doesn't seem to be something to do with the code where its listed only once. Does anyone know if the infobox template was changed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.5.254.27 (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

This seems to have been corrected - perhaps it was the template. Roscoestl (talk) 05:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Puff statements

Submitting information to the Redbook, then quoting from it, does not qualify it as a WP:RELY source. If the school has more merit scholars than any other, an independent source might have noticed this and commented on it. But the diocese is not independent, nor is any other publication which the Priory controls. Please watch WP:BOOSTER issues. This is not WP:PR for the Priory, but an encyclopedia. Student7 (talk) 15:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Saint Louis Priory School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090429033455/http://www.advanc-ed.org:80/schools_districts/school_district_listings/? to http://www.advanc-ed.org/schools_districts/school_district_listings/?

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)