Talk:Saharastega

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saharastega article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Saharastega is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"First basal Temnospondyl"??[edit]

I'm deleting the sentance " Paleontologists suggest that along with Nigerpeton, Saharastega is the first basal genus of the Temnospondyli, a group of prehistoric amphibians."

This is not anything that has been suggested by palaeontologists. The Moradi formation is late Permian, and basal temnospondyls have been around since the late Carboniferous, more that 50 million years earlier (see Ruta et al 2007). Looking at the paper cited, I think they may have misunderstood the part where the authors were saying these were the first member of a basal family found outside Europe or America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.201.100.83 (talk) 11:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]