Talk:SS Meteor (1896)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The description about "she needing all the help she can get" sounds too emotional. This is an encyclopedia.


From: "The Meteor is a relic of the early days of steam transportation on the lakes with many original fixtures, such as engine & wheel, and needs to be preserved, whatever the cost."

"needs to be preserved, whatever the cost."

While I agree, this is pure opinion.

some edits[edit]

I trimmed some of the POV, and tightened up the text a bit, as well as tried to wfy and add some refs. Still needs work though. ++Lar: t/c 02:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SS Meteor (1896). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sagamore[edit]

I'm not sure that the link to SS Sagamore (1892) is correct. Could somone more knowledgable investigate, please? .John M Brear (talk) 14:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]