Talk:SR Lord Nelson class

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSR Lord Nelson class has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2024Good article nomineeListed
August 11, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
May 14, 2022Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Again, a good article. Perhaps more wikiliking but not a pre-requisite of GA, so, pass. The Rambling Man 17:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 

Talk:SR Lord Nelson class/GA1

 

Talk:SR Lord Nelson class/GA2

GA Reassessment[edit]

SR Lord Nelson class[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

Multiple passages missing citations. Several existing citations are missing page numbers. I am not convinced that "Southern Railway E-mail Group" is a reliable source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]