Talk:SPT0418-47
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
The press releases (can it be considered as a reliable source) about this galaxy mention that it is surprisingly similar to the Milky Way, while it is in fact very different (much higher gas fraction, very high star formation rate, more compact...). Should the wikipedia article be more based on the Nature article about this object (rotating object with low velocity dispersion) rather than the press release?