Talk:SNCASO

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was no contest to move to an unnamed page, and to convert this page to a DAB. Moving to SNCASO per discussion here and at WT:AIR#Sud-Est/Sud-Ouest. Will need to have that page deleted by an admin first before I can make the move. - BillCJ (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sud-Ouest" is extremely generic (it means "South-West" in French), lots of things can be referred to, this needs to be renamed, and a dab created in its place (from the hatnote). I suggest SNCASO or Société nationale des constructions aéronautiques du sud-ouest . There is a related company article at SNCAO, so the SNCASO type name is already used for articles on Wikipedia. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 09:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Support - Per nom. - BillCJ (talk) 13:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My preferred choice is SNCASO. "Foo (company)" is not my usual prefered way of DABbing aircraft company names unless it's overwhlmingly the common name, which I don't believe is the case here. - BillCJ (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another possibility is "Sud-Ouest (company)" if Sud-Ouest is determined to be the most common name. — AjaxSmack 18:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Google [1] suggest that the airplane company is not the most prominent usage of this term, from the first 100 hits. Rather, the Montreal burrough, the Cameroon province, etc, are all more prominent. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I have stated on a similar previous nomination, create the dab page first at Sud-Ouest (disambiguation), then request the move. It's a warranted move but adding a long list of hatnotes could be seen as bordering on WP:POINT and is not the most elegant way to make a case. — AjaxSmack 18:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith, this seems to be more a case of not knowing the right way to do this than trying to make a point. Although I would not have done it that way, leaving it as is saves the trouble of needing an admin to move the DAB page back here. - BillCJ (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.