Talk:SMS Sperber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSMS Sperber has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Sperber is part of the Unprotected cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2014Good article nomineeListed
October 8, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Sperber/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 23:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll take this article for review, and should have my full comments up by later tonight. Dana boomer (talk) 23:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • I'm sure you've checked the IP addition from April 5 to make sure everything is solid there?
    • Yeah, it's the standard note explaining SMS and the translation of the ship's name.
    • Lead, "but was thereafter used as a target ship until 1918. She was thereafter sold" - close repetition of "thereafter".
    • Changed the second one to "later"
    • Second deployment abroad, "presence was unnecessary there." I think the "there" is unnecessary.
    • Sounds fine to me.
    • Second deployment abroad, "German East Africa to replace Bussard there." Again, the "there" doesn't seem to be adding anything.
    • Removed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall very solid, just a few minor comments on prose. Placing the article on hold until these can be addressed. Dana boomer (talk) 23:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks yet again, I think everything should be corrected. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    And again everything looks good, so passing to GA. Dana boomer (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sperber[edit]

I have a Picture of my great grandfather who severed on the Sperber we always referred to him as sea Opa 76.66.175.168 (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SMS Sperber[edit]

update on Photo my great grandfather's name was Franz Leopold Kollandt. He served for a long time on SMS Sperber Diane Mills 76.66.175.168 (talk) 23:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]