Talk:SMS Sankt Georg

SMS Sankt Georg has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 21, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Sankt Georg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ship's commander was not shot, but the executive officer[edit]

The following sentences in the article are wrong: "An enlisted man shot the ship's commander in the head, badly injuring him." "...four men were executed, including the sailor who had shot Sankt Georg's commander" The source given: Halpern, Cattaro mutiny p. 48–50. But Halpern's article in Bell’s and Elleman’s book starts on p. 54. On p. 59 Halpern writes that the Executive officer (in Austrian German: Gesamtdetailoffizier, GDO) was shot in the head and severely wounded. Plaschka writes that the commander of St. George was narrowly missed. de:Richard Georg Plaschka: Cattaro - Prag. Revolte und Revolution. Kriegsmarine und Heer Österreich-Ungarns im Feuer der Aufstandsbewegungen vom 1. Februar und 28 Oktober, 1918. Graz 1963, p. 40.

The source: Gericht des k.u.k. Kriegshafenkommandos in Cattaro: S.M.S. „St. Georg“. Referat und Antrag. Typoscript vom 9. April 1918, Austrian State Archives/War Archives, Sig. KA MAG KT.1. accessible online (5 December 2019) at: [1] says: „Während sie [vier Leute] gegen Achter gingen, kam ihnen der inzwischen an Deck geeilte Korv. Kp. Zipperer entgegen und rief ihnen etwas zu, worauf sie einen oder zwei Schüsse auf ihn abfeuerten, so dass derselbe schwer verletzt zu Boden stürzte.“ (Rückseite von Bl. 1093) Und an anderer Stelle: „Auch der Schiffskommandant Frgt. Kpt. von Huber war auf Deck geeilt; dort schoss Ujdur aus dem Hinterhalt auf ihn, ohne ihn jedoch zu treffen.“ (vierte Seite von Bl. 1094) (Transl.: While they [four people] went against aft, the corvette captain Zipperer, who had rushed on deck in the meantime, went towards them, and shouted something to them, whereupon they fired one or two shots at him, so that the same fell to the ground severely injured. At another page: Also the ship commander Frgt. Kpt. von Huber had hurried on deck; there Ujdur shot him from ambush, but missing him.)

Ship's commander was frigate captain Huber Edler von Scheibenhain.

--Kuhl-k (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]