Talk:SMS Erzherzog Albrecht

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSMS Erzherzog Albrecht has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Erzherzog Albrecht is part of the Ironclads of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 9, 2016Good article nomineeListed
December 22, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 12, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that SMS Erzherzog Albrecht was one of the first two iron-hulled ships built for the Austro-Hungarian navy?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Erzherzog Albrecht/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 13:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section 1[edit]

  • Para 1; Sentence 1; "The design for Erzherzog Albrecht was prepared by Chief Engineer Josef von Romako....", Chief Engineer of what? Please specify.
    • Reworded, see how that works.
  • Para 1; Sentence 2; Add a comma(,) after "....e new ship should favor heavy armor".
    • I don't think a comma is actually necessary there, since the sentence is only talking about two things (i.e., if you simplify it, it amounts to "Romako decided the ship should have heavy armor and end-on fire").

Section 1.1[edit]

  • Para 1; last sentence; There is a full stop (.) missing after "A smallconning tower was built aft of the foremast"
    • Good catch, fixed.

Section 1.2[edit]

  • In the first sentence it is "24-centimeter", but in the later sentences just "cm" is used. Revise this to maintain consistency.
    • I generally like to spell out units the first time I use them and abbreviate thereafter.

Section 2[edit]

  • No issues

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. It's worth pointing out that I just added some additional material from a book that finally came in from inter-library loan. Parsecboy (talk) 12:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No issues with that, de-linked the dup link of Pola in the first para. Good to go. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SMS_Erzherzog_Albrecht&oldid=1201188573"