Talk:SK Brann

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Norway Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Norwegian football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Norway Start‑class

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Player nicknames[edit]

[This really regards the individual player articles, but I raise the issue here instead]]

I think we should only list the player nicknames in those cases were the nicknames are well established. While I agree with "Kalven", "örn 1", "Örn 2", even "skjønningen", haha, I don't agree with "Arne" (Monkam), "Kenguruen" or "Ragnvaldho". I'm removing those. --Kvaks 06:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review.[edit]

I can't pass this under the GA criteria at this time. The lead needs to be expanded per WP:LEAD, plus there needs to be references.--Wizardman 21:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overview[edit]

"Brann is historically arguably the biggest club in Norway in terms of public interest"

How can this be when there are clubs with a higher average attendance than Brann —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.61.253 (talk) 14:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although I'm uncertain about the truth of this statement, it's been known for years that Brann stadion is too small compared to the public interest in the team - some argue that the stadium could be expanded to a capacity of almost 25,000 and still almost fill it up every game. You can't compare the public interest in a club only by looking at the average attendance number. --Aqwis (talk) 15:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may well be true, but I can't find any sources backing up the statement that Brann is by far the most popular club in Norway. 129.241.61.253 (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the statement was pov and unverifiable and has changed it. Rettetast (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brann had the highest season average attendance record from 1963 to 2003, when the record was beaten by another big club, Rosenborg. The last years, a number of clubs have updated their stadium or built a new one, while economic and fundamental issues made Brann stadium small in comparison to Rosenborg's stadium, Lerkendal, and others. With the updating of Brann stadium from 17 890 to almost 24 000 from 2006 to 2010, Brann may take back the record during the 2010-decade. Elev77 (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean each and every year in the period 1963-2003? If so, I doubt that very much. --Kvaks (talk) 07:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His point is that before Rosenborg had 15,825 per match in 2003, no other norwegian club could match Brann's season average attendance from 1963 with 15,486 per match. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

I see no reason whatsoever for SK Brann 2008 to merged into SK Brann. Brandenburg (talk) 18:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, although it could do with a change of name. Perhaps SK Brann season 2008 would be more appropriate. – Pee Jay 11:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the merge tags. No argument for merging has been presented. Rettetast (talk) 14:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on SK Brann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]