Talk:Russian monitor Admiral Lazarev

Russian monitor Admiral Lazarev has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 17, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Admiral Lazarev/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 00:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One more before I go out, why not? Courcelles (talk) 00:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could use a sentence or two on who Admiral Lazarev was? Not every flag-officer gets a ship named after him.
" of 269–74 officers and crewmen" of between 269–274" would flow better, and MOS has recently changed not to drop the leading digit.
- I hate this change. "Bad RfC, Bad boy!"
Subject-verb agreement, " but accuracy was poor and they were later removed,"; The they were implies there was more than one mortar installed, while the prior sentence indicates there was only one.
" armor that 4–4.5 inches (102–114 mm) thick" That was 4...?
"The turrets had 6 inches (152 mm) inches"
I'm going to be a pain and ask for a direct citation for "This may have been the first serious proposal by a designer for an aircraft carrier that utilized most of the features of modern carriers."

Good work. Courcelles (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Promoting. Courcelles (talk) 15:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]