Talk:RusRating

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

omg i am not finished with the article yet[edit]

http://www.rusrating.ru/en/ http://www.sino-us.com/136/1505036610.html http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific_business/view/1232985/1/.html

Here you can see its relevant article i wasnt finished yet so just wait a hour or so.--Venajaguardian (talk) 11:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Its valued article, i just wanst finished yet and saved it with one sentence only completed. Its now finished with many information about this company. It also has a russian wikipedia article http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81-%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3) --Venajaguardian (talk) 14:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article may or may not be thought to indicate importance, but it is still eligible for speedy deletion as both blatant advertising and copyright violation. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
where is it advertisement?? If the only website who has information about the history is their official website?--Venajaguardian (talk) 14:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you copy material from a promotional web site then the result is clearly advertising. If nobody independent has written about this company then we shouldn't have an article about it. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course independents have written about it, you can see in my article india russia daily, taz, Russia today, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and many more have written about the company. The ceo gives often interviews and as i said there is a russian article.--Venajaguardian (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://rt.com/business/news/rating-agencies-russia-role-543/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NkUN214mSk http://www.dw.de/konkurrenz-f%C3%BCr-die-gro%C3%9Fen-ratingagenturen/a-16383108 http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=106521008

If you feel like experimenting with this article, I suggest that you first prepare a draft in your Sandbox and then link to it from WP:Articles for creation so as to allow for a meaningful discussion before someone deletes this contested article again. kashmiri 18:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]