Talk:Route 261 (Delaware–Pennsylvania)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRoute 261 (Delaware–Pennsylvania) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2012Good article nomineeListed


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 261/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a route map for google/bing.

Requested for one to be made. Dough4872 19:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
KML added. Dough4872 18:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Route description

"The road heads neat business parks" What exactly is meant by this, can you reword to make clearer?

Fixed. Dough4872 19:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
History

What is the Blue Ball Properties project? Do you have a source to support it to check it out?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added some details. Dough4872 19:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Seems to meet requirements. But I would strongly recommend you take Freddie's advice and learn how to create the maps and links. I think they are very important to writing about roads.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's this about (older) PA 61?[edit]

I find:

"PA 261 was first designated in 1928 to run from the Delaware border to PA 61 (Concord Road) and PA 161 (Chelsea Road) in Chelsea, following Foulk Road."

OK (and OK for the link to PA 161, which route number is no longer in use, but I fail to see (on PA 61 page, with PA 61 running north out of Reading) a reference to this older use of PA 61 designation.

The original PA 61 was designated along what became US 322 between Concordville and Chester, which is now today unnumbered Concord Road. The route can be seen on the 1928 map. Pennsylvania Route 61 (1920s) exists as a redirect to U.S. Route 322 in Pennsylvania, which is where the original designation of PA 61 should be covered. The current PA 61, which was designated in the 1960s to replace the portion of US 122 between Reading and Sunbury, has no relation to the former route and therefore the former route is not covered in the PA 61 article. Dough4872 00:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Route 261 (Delaware–Pennsylvania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]