Talk:Roundabout (Yes song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

keys[edit]

The outro goes back to the key of E major . . . .

Funny that this is the only mention of key! Does the song begin in E major? What's between? —Tamfang (talk) 06:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It begins, and remains in Em, for simplicity's sake. We could get into where it's in Dorian mode in parts, and not in others, but with a prog-rock band, those are pretty foolish errands. And ending a cadence in E major from Em is called a picardy third. Thought I saw this in the article years ago, don't know why it got taken out, but probably because of some music-nerd academic edit war. O0drogue0o (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roundabout (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lyrics change?[edit]

The lyrics I hear are not the same as what I read. "Mountains come out of the sky and they stand there" is what is written. "Marlins" (in place of mountains) is what I'm hearing. Anyone else have the same problem? Thanks. CrummyVerses (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)CrummyVerses[reply]

Honestly doubt anyone else is suffering from this problem. Maybe a quality set of headphones, or a visit to a hearing specialist? Not being flippant, but this just seems kind of out there. O0drogue0o (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before 1971[edit]

If this song was originally released in 1971, how did it wind up on the soundtrack to the 1968 Psychedelic film Psych-Out? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't. Backward time travel is not yet possible, as much as so many of us would like it to be. https://www.discogs.com/release/5784892-Various-Psych-Out-Original-Motion-Picture-Soundtrack O0drogue0o (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Composition[edit]

In the "Composition" section, we have the sentence "Wakeman played the lowest E note on his grand piano with the E an octave higher which gave it "a fatter feel"." I don't care what the (paywalled, [btw—problematic] source) material says about their interview (especially since it's a paywalled source, and elderly rockers from the '60s/'70s often aren't the best sources for memories of their own past) what Wakeman played on the piano is very clearly not a "note" but a full Em chord taped in reverse, and then an alternating C major. Chords aren't "notes", no matter what the old rockers say. Also, that attribution needs to link to a valid archive, not a paywalled Wall Street Journal article. But at any rate, it is clearly wrong. I could provide audio examples and spectral audio readings of the same reverse piano, but I'm not gonna do that kind of work rn, because MediaWiki is apparently broken, and the thing should anyway be plainly obvious to anyone with decent hearing. I can do it, though, if someone asks. O0drogue0o (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one spoke up, so I made the changes, which are an improvement. O0drogue0o (talk) 09:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]