Talk:Roswell A. Parmenter

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state): Capital District

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Capital District (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

You keep removing the tag, {{no footnotes|date=October 2012}} from articles. And when you do you cite the Manual of Style, can you cite something specific in the manual of style that prohibits the tag. If you do I will remove the tag myself. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The shoe is on the other foot, Mr. Norton. You show me a guideline which requires the tag, and I will add the tags myself. Besides, see my comment on single sources at the Tabor article. Also see: WP:GENREF - I quote: "The disadvantage of using general references alone is that text–source integrity is lost, unless the article is very short. Is that too difficult to understand, Mr. Norton? Kraxler (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see how that applies at all. Wikipedia:Inline citation says: "Any statement that has been challenged [requires an inline citation]" I have no clue which reference is supporting which fact and which fact has no reference. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 15:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You better quit writing in an encyclopedia, if you have to admit that you don't understand anything. Now I'll explain it once: All statements are referenced, there is nothing without reference. Got it? All statements are sourced from the Life Sketches. Got it? Or was that already too fast? The Court History is the source for the tenure as City Attorney, since this occurred after the publication of the Life Sketches. Now that was a big jump, I know. But by tomorrow it will have soaked in. The death date is from his obituary in the ABA report. I suggest you quit Wikipedia, and watch TV series instead, that's much easier. And by the way, stop edit warring. Propose changes, or challenge statements (according to the guidelines) on the Talk Page. Kraxler (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can disagree with me but please be polite, it costs you nothing. Instead of you explaining here which fact goes with each source, I am adding the proper citation to the fact. This way the next reader can verify that without having to read each of the sources you list at the end of the article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]