Talk:Roswell, New Mexico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

editing[edit]

great job on the article, but i think it needs to be edited for grammar and smoothness. i am not a grammarian or else i would do it(plus im lazy) -matt

Need to mention the International UFO Museum in Article:"Roswell,New Mexico[edit]

The International UFO Museum may be contacted at

Phone:1-505-625-9495 Fax:1-505-625-9495

This is the place that has all or nearly all of the data, some artifacts of what happened when a UFO had crashed there in 1947. Some of the artifacts allegedly depict some of the derbis found, the alleged assault of people by US Army personnel concearning the UFO crash. The building is built with a flying saucer crashing into the building, and states"International UFO Museum".

External source is http//:www.iufomrc.com[1] for anyone interested. I have been to the place myself.I may write a seperate article on the museum.Martial Law 08:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians living in the Roswell area should "check out" this place.Martial Law 09:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unless removed, disregard mentioning the "UFO Museum" in the article. It's already mentioned.Martial Law 09:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Roswell UFO Incident as mentioned in the Roswell, NM article[edit]

I'm concerned that some of the folks who are in revert wars as well as others who just don't have the stomach for that in the "Roswell UFO Incident" category are coming to the Roswell, NM article to try to give it a UFO spin. The Roswell article is for the TOWN, period. The UFO Incident article is for the UFO Incident! Isn't that obvious? Anyhow, I intend to try to keep the UFO content to a bare minimum in the Roswell NM article. It's the wrong place to try to slip in quotes, factoids, theories... kctipton 22:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the place where the UFO allegedly went down. Martial Law 07:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]
No it is not. 75 miles away wouldn't even put it in the same county. Roswell UFO Museum should get a mention in that article ("roswell incident") and not here. kctipton 19:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Protect?[edit]

{{editprotected}}

Lots of Vandalism on this page. ---Redmarkviolinist (talk)Editor Review 04:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

☒N No edit specified. If you want to have the page protected, please see WP:RPP. Sandstein (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"City of Roswell of the Guatemalen Republic"???? Yeah I think we need some vandalism protection DrHenley (talk) 23:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged File:Second_UFO_07-03-2008_11;38;04PM.JPG, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 07:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Resident. Ed Mitchell?[edit]

Astronaut Ed Mitchell was asked by Howard Hughes on his Internet Radio Programme The Unexplained if The U.S. really had Aliens at Roswell replied; 'well I grew up in Roswell so I think I would have found out if there really were Aliens held there' (The Unexplained Feb 2011). Wiki article states Mr Mitchell was raised in Texas, no mention of Roswell.Johnwrd (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous Data in Article[edit]

Relevant to this article, I find the climate data highly erroneous. I happen to live VERY close to Roswell, and I can personally verify that the weather is described more akin to the weather found in Albuquerque than in the Roswell area. Roswell MIGHT get one 1-inch (25.4mm) snow per year, and it is a VERY rare event that the daily high temperature doesn't exceed freezing. An average late-December day is 60°F for a high, and 25°F for a low. This persists into January, with warming starting mid-February. The coldest month is January, not October-November, and frequent high-winds during the winter are routine. Actual climatalogical data supports what I am saying. The winters are normally dry (and you must take that into account for an area that gets 10-14 inches (250-300mm) of rainfall per year). A better temperature climate picture can be seen on the Intellicast website, and general climate information relative to precipitation can be seen on several sites that will verify the desert climate for very low rainfall.

It should also be noted that Roswell is mentioned as 'being in the high plains', but Roswell's elevation above MSL is only 3,750-ft, which would qualify it for 'plains' or 'intermediate plains', but for the fact that it is NOT in the plains, nor is it at one-mile elevation, using the term 'high plains' for Roswell is like saying that New York City is in the Smoky Mountains. Roswell is in, and part of the Chihuahua Desert, not the High Plains (which are moreso recognized as the locations above the Ogalala Aquifer, in the areas of western Nebraska, eastern Colorado, western North and South Dakota, and parts of eastern Montana.

Can we please get a major correction of this article as a result of the numerous significant errors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mountaindweller4 (talkcontribs) 19:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Indigenous Settlers[edit]

The History section refers to, "The first non-indigenous settlers." If you're indigenous, you can't be a settler by definition, and vice-versa. Wouldn't it be more correct to say Western, European, or modern in place of non-indigenous?

indigenous: 1. Originating and living or occurring naturally in an area or environment. 2. Intrinsic; innate.

settler: a person who goes to live in a new place where usually there are few or no people.

50.79.129.73 (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roswell, New Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]