The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Ross Street is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
On 14 October 2017, someone calling herself "Diannaa" removed 26,611 bytes of carefully formatted information,
with the justification "remove excessive non-free content, per WP:NFCC. Material should be summarized in your own words, not quoted verbatim. Properly formatted bulleted lists".
Apparently the last sentence meant she removed various blank lines, which is fine with me.
As to the "non-free content" issue, I am making some inquiries on that subject, and will report back when I know more.
However some of her deletions do not involve "non-free content":
She removed the references to, and links to, relevant discussions at the Kan Extension Seminar. Why? These discussions were about (some of) Street's papers, and give a fuller view on Street's work. What is wrong with that? In no way is that "non-free content". Further, several weeks ago, I contacted, via email, the organizer of that seminar, Emily Riehl, and asked if she had any objection to my linking to those discussions. She responded and gave no objection, in fact offered thanks for being included. So why the deletion?
She also deleted some material I had written, such as
Among other things, KKR develop the theory of bimodules over a biclosed, but not necessarily symmetric, monoidal category . Their development of the theory of cofibrations is modeled on that in Street's "Fibrations in bicategories."
again for reasons unknown to me.
And she deleted some important qualifications, such as, to "Fibrations in Bicategories": "followed in 1987 by a four page correction and addendum."
None of the three items listed above have any "non-free content".
So why the deletions?
KHarbaugh (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
