Talk:Romano Pontifici eligendo

European Microstates: Vatican City Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Mid-importance).

Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ref the crowing

Strictly speaking, as the new Pope, John Paul I and John Paul II in their role of Pope, could modify/dispense any requirement predating them (such as the crowing required by Italic textRomano Pontifici Eligendo.Italic text DaveTroy 12:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub status[edit]

142.160.131.202, I really don't want to edit war with you on this, but it has over 1800 prose characters and 303 words. Thats more than the DYK minimum which has become the standard test for what a stub is. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that I won't be edit warring over the placement of a stub template (of all things) either. I would consider the article a stub given that it is equivalent to three solid paragraphs of prose, but I do recognize that it is approaching the borderline and I'm not going to fight over it by any means if you revert me again. 142.160.131.202 (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it again. I prefer consistency and DYK has come to become the de facto stub standard. Thanks for the explanation. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:09, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]