Talk:Rock Band 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The Wii edition of Rock Band 2 automatically attempts to access any SD memory card installed in the Wii. However, unlike many other Wii games, RB2 does not support SDHC cards, and will disable Wii SD card memory if the installed SD card is something other than a regular SD card (limited to 2GB). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.80.145 (talk) 02:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

The Wii edition of this game was released Dec 18, 2008. I know, because I was waiting for it, and every time they delayed the release it caused a great deal of dismay in our house as it was intended to be our family holiday gift. We ended up buying GHWT with instruments on Dec 5 because Harmonix refused to give a firm release date again and again. The day the game came into the store, we purchased the standalone version - that was on Dec 18, 2008. All of the articles used as citations list the release date as Dec 18 as well, so there can be no doubt or argument. I'm not sure why someone changed the article (it most definitely had the correct dates the last time I visited the page), but I have corrected the error. I'm more than a little bit irked that anyone would attempt to claim it was released at the same time as the 360 and PS3 versions either through ignorance or an attempt to revise history. Try making sure you read the citations before making edits when you don't know the facts. CokeBear (talk) 22:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I believe the release date has been altered and is incorrect for the PS3, now that I look at the article again. Someone who has the time should make those corrections as well - someone seems to have made a deliberate attempt to alter the facts. In other words, it doesn't seem to be just an innocent "typo". CokeBear (talk) 22:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Someone definitely changed the dates. RB2 had a exclusivity period on the 360 in the US. I've fixed what appears wrong. --MASEM (t) 23:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]