Talk:Robin DR400

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 2 February 2008 by reviewer MSGJ (talk · contribs).

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Production numbers[edit]

According to Rod Simpson's 2022 General Aviation Handbook, construction numbers of the DR300 and DR400 are on a single sequence, starting at c/n 301 with the first DR300 and reaching c/n 2770 by mid 2021 - this would give 2470 built if there are no gaps in the sequence. It also gives 306 DR400s built by Robin between 2000 and 2020. Note that DR500s used a separate c/n sequence.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW: The Infobox on the French language page mentions "Nombre construit: 2 700 exemplaires au 30/06/2017" (2700 built by 30/june/2017) but without mentioning any sources. It does seem a very high number indeed. Jan olieslagers (talk) 15:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the numbers in Simpson 2022 refer to the DR300 and DR400 - it is unclear whether they include the DR340, DR330 and DR315.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is all very vague. As long as no formal source for the magical figure of 2700 is given, it should be questioned, or even removed. If I may be excused: France and the French have a long-standing tradition and reputation for over-esteeming their own merits, great though they may be (the DR400 and its predecessors are great planes!); we really should insist on firm references. Jan olieslagers (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robin's current website states 'more than 3,000' in the 1972 tab and 4,500 in 2017 but that is a total for all their types. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]