Talk:Robert Amsterdam
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Amsterdam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
black media campaigns[edit]
I am deleting this section. It is a blog post from his personal site making a lot of unverified claims that Hugo Chavez is undertaking a propaganda campaign against him. This is not news, it is self serving BS 24.207.226.108 (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Human Rights?[edit]
The article claims he has litigated human rights cases. This needs a source, because as far as I can tell he exclusively does corporate and tax law. I will delete this soon unless someone can provide a source for a human rights case he has litigated 24.207.226.108 (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Thaksin Shinawatra[edit]
If no one objects, I'll rename this section Thailand. Then add to See also of related articles [[Robert Amsterdam#Thailand|Robert Amsterdam SECTION Thailand]] --Pawyilee (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
POV (self?)promotion removed[edit]
I trimmed it down by removing POV language and unsourced statements. Please work on the rest as per the challenge about this BLP on top. Zezen (talk) 21:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced defamatory material[edit]
I removed this section claiming that other lawyers were critical of Amsterdam's line of defense in the Yukos case, because no source was cited, and the material could be considered as potentially libelous.Kaffekup (talk) 12:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)