Talk:Roaring Meg (cannon)

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Why Meg?[edit]

Hagen, Rose-Marie; Hagen, Rainer (2003). What Great Paintings Say. Vol. 2 (illustrated, reprint ed.). Taschen. p. 182. ISBN 9783822813720.

The above helps explain why Meg which is short for Margaret was a popular name of cannons. In various parts of Northern Europe women who were seen as "particularly strong, aggressive of spiteful" were nicknamed Margaret.

Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Meg, n.1 "Chiefly Brit. regional (freq. humorous or derogatory). A coarse, unsophisticated, or unattractive woman. (Long) Meg of Westminster n. a woman (perh. fictional) famous in 16th-cent. London for having supposedly fought, disguised as a man, in the Anglo-French campaigns of 1544 (now hist.); (allusively) a tall or masculine woman, a virago. (Quot. 1582 in N.E.D. is based on a forged title page.)"

Perhaps someone would like to use the two sources to explain why "Meg" was a popular name for a cannon. -- PBS (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

please clean up[edit]

the content is completely mixed up. first, the article is half about other meanings. second, these other meanings including other cannons and even rivers is widely distributed throughout the article under different headlines. complete mess. needs complete rewriting