Talk:Rivers, Roads & Rails

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal[edit]

The licence for Connect (game) was transferred to Ravensburger, who published it essentially unchanged as Contact. In 1984 they added the Rivers, Roads & Rails theme to make it more appealing to children. Apart from the theme it's still the same game. --Hans Adler (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surely Connect is a totally separate game. Ken Garland is a very important UK graphic designer and Connect is a fine demonstration of his work. Rivers, Roads & Rails has the same game play but a completely different, and inferior, design. Thus rendering teh fact that it was created by a graphic designer irrelevant.

Two entries are there fore needed to distinguish the very different types of game. --User:Goodide (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are not different "types" of games if they only differ in design. Certainly Three Men's Morris and Six Men's Morris are more different from each other and from Nine Men's Morris, where they are correctly treated. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and encyclopedias discuss closely related topics together. It hardly gets more closely related than gameplay X with design A and name N published by P, then gameplay X with design A and name M published by Q, then gameplay X with design B and name L published by Q.
Both articles are relatively small and would profit from being merged into a bigger article. If you start an article on Ken Garland (I am assuming he is notable, otherwise don't do it), then merging Connect (game) there would be another option. In fact, Connect should then be discussed in both places, stressing different aspects. --Hans Adler (talk) 16:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rivers, Roads & Rails. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]