Talk:Rittmaster

Military history: Culture / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Moved[edit]

This was moved last November without discussion, or even a good reason. The edit summary stated
"In this case there's an English term".
If there is an English term in this case I've yet to hear it; "Rotamaster" isn't even a fair translation (Ritt = ride, not rota) and doesn't appear in the OED. In any event Rittmeister is common enough in English as a borrowed term to satisfy WP:TITLE.
I suggest if anyone wants the page moved they take it to WP:RM and provide a decent (preferably accurate!) rationale. Moonraker12 (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rotmistr[edit]

I've moved the information on the Polish, Lithuanian and Russian ranks down, as I'm not at all sure they are the same thing. The German term is (presumaby) derived from Ritter (rider, or knight) and the rank commands a troop (which is about 15 men); the Polish term (it is claimed) is from the name of a formation (a rota) of about six. So are they related? Or is it just that, coincidentally, they sound similar? Moonraker12 (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There was an early-modern rank of "Rottmeister" in german military too, which is to be found and described in various war manuals of that period (Kriegsbuch Fronsbergers, Dillich a.s.o.). Since the polish (lithuanian as well) military was at its hayday during that period one can make a connection to "Rottmeister" back then rather as towards "Rittmeister" (which is a more modern term for "Reyter-Obrist").--78.52.29.155 (talk) 12:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with rotmistrz[edit]

In late reply to User:Moonraker12 old comments above: the rotmistrz article was merged here in 2010 [1] by User:UeArtemis, without any discussion (through granted, UeArtemis did ask a question at Talk:Rotmistrz to which nobody replied). The merger might have been a mistake, but a more throughout review of the topic is needed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rittmeister. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030021630/http://www.mindef.nl/binaries/6073_Defensie_Rangen_NL_tcm15-23071.pdf to http://www.mindef.nl/binaries/6073_Defensie_Rangen_NL_tcm15-23071.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not "was"[edit]

As usual this article was written with a quite heavy German-centric focus. Rittmeister isn't exclusively a German rank or even a German word. It is a native word in the Scandinavian languages, even with the exact spelling rittmeister in one of the two official forms of Norwegian (the exact spelling isn't of much importance anyway, since spellings change over time, both in German and in the Scandinavian languages). It is a rank in the Norwegian cavalry to this day, with a history dating back to the 16th century, and officially ranks as OF-2 within NATO. Rittmeister is not a thing of the past. --Petterstørv (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Riding master[edit]

I would like to propose that this page is moved to Riding master. Rittmeister is simply Riding master in Scandi/German. Wikipedia articles are normally named in their English terms. I don't see anything distinctive in the article that would make Riding master as a title unsuitable. It would also help as then the article could be broadened to bring in British army usage, and from other English speaking countries.Wayne Jayes (talk) 08:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

English name[edit]

Maybe we could move the article to the "cavalry master" or "riding master" as they would be an English translation of the title?TheEditMate (talk) 22:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]