Talk:Richard Rudgley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

it appears that Rudgley's first book on drugs was indeed "critically acclaimed" and won him an award, but that he later lost it and his books on the Stone Age, Paganism and Barbarians are essentially debunked as rubbish by critics. --dab (𒁳) 12:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudgley, Denise Schmandt-Besserat and others.[edit]

I'm puzzled about the appraisal of Rudgley's stone age books. The article gives an excerpt from Denise Schmandt-Besserat's critical review of Secrets of the Stone Age (it is not clear whether the book or the television series). But if we follow the link to her we find the very first reference to her work, in a wholly positive tone, is "Rudgley, Richard (2000). The Lost Civilizations of the Stone Age. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 48–57." Looking at that reference, which is chapter 3 of the book, we find that Rudgley does indeed describe Schmandt-Besserat's work in glowing terms, using phrases like "brilliantly and convincingly argued" (page 50). This seems a surprisingly asymmetrical mutual appraisal between these two authors.

I'm also curious about other reviews of "Lost Civilisations of the Stone Age". On the back of my copy it has

"Wonderful reading ... illuminating ... a zest for discovery that makes it a page-turner" Nature

together with similarly positive comments from the Mail on Sunday and from Martin Bernal. Nature, in particular, must be regarded as a reputable source of criticism, so would it not be more balanced to cite that too? SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What can I say? I've got her review, which is of 'Lost Civilizations', not 'Secrets', the book of the tv program. Schmandt-Besserat isn't happy about the way her work and that of her colleagues was used. A very short review is here [1]. I don't have Robb's Nature review, and we can't use just the bit from Amazon as who knows what the rest says? I can't find anything from the Daily Mail or Bernal. dougweller (talk) 14:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]