Talk:Revolution Is Not a Dinner Party (novel)

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I would fist like to point out that this was my first full article and was created as part of a project- and though the article is factual I had to include an element that would not normally be considered appropriate for such an article concerning something relatively minor in the scheme of things- the section "Critical Reception". I really would like to see this article stay up on Wikipedia (as said in my handout in my project: "... provinding material for future generations of students to cheat off of..." [though not that is not the real reason I want this article to stay up]), but I feel that the article needs some changes.

I believe the following changes should be made to make the article more encyclopedic:

Include an Image of the book: I myself am not familiar with the terms and conditions of uploading and/or including images into Wikipedia articles especially in this case considering the cover of the book would be a copyrighted work.
Delete Section "Critical Reception": Required for the project, however I believe there is too little information here to be of significance in the article as the book lacks substantial reviews (trust me- I broke my back trying to find even semi-valuable sources and reviews) and (for now[?]) does not have a notable influence on modern culture or literature. However if more information on the book's critical reception and reviews can be found that would make this entry more meaningful I am all for keeping the section.
I feel that a few of the external hyperlinks should be deleted as they do not redirect to the most reliable of sources (though a minimum number of links was required as part of a project [I apologize for their {temporary} inclusion]). WIth the exception of "Critical Reception", the entire article was based of information within the book and not from external sources. My problem is that I am not sure how I would reference the book itself as appropriate to Wikipedia*.
I feel that (at least parts of) the sub-section "Awards" should be deleted as this information sticks out like a sore thumb in the article and undermines the encyclopedic value of the article. That is stictly my opinion but I would like to hear what your take on that section is. I believe that, providing they are significant** enough, some of the awards should be kept.

It would also be greatly appreciated if someone could make improve the format of this article. (I know this was a boatload of text to swallow though, so sorry for that).

*I have more to say concerning this statement and my problem so if you are interested on helping me out with this problem I would greatly appreciate it (Message me if you are).

**I understand I am a little vague on how significant "Significant" is, but that is why we have a discussion page.

--Ham Radio 00:30, 20 September 2011 (UTC)