Talk:Resident Evil – Code: Veronica/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 18:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

Alright TarkusAB, I'll review this. It might take a few days, since I'm also doing TumbleSeed right now. ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64: No worries, Thanks. TarkusAB^talk 19:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have fully reviewed the article before the end of the week. It's looking good from what I can see. ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright TarkusAB, the article's looking pretty good. Here are my first comments:

I'd add the information on the size of the development team to the beginning of its paragraph.

Done TarkusAB^talk 18:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd remove the ScrewAttack citation from "legacy". ScrewAttack is considered an unreliable source according to WP:VG/S.

Done TarkusAB^talk 18:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you try to trim the plot a little bit? I understand that games like this have long plots, but could it possibly be a bit shorter?

It definitely can be shorter. In rewriting the plots on Sonic 06 and Chaotix, I read more on how to write a good plot, so this can be tightened up. Work in progress... TarkusAB^talk 18:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK this is done. TarkusAB^talk 23:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd consider changing the name of the second PS2 Classic link; it seems odd to show it linked twice.

Yea that is funky isn't it. Done. TarkusAB^talk 18:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC) @TarkusAB: Alright, one more tiny thing. There's a typo in the legacy section: "Game Informer's" should just be "Game Informer". I'll be more than happy to promote once this is fixed. ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 00:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64: Done, and FYI most nominators are OK with reviewers making minor fixes like that as they review. TarkusAB^talk 00:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'm still new to the GAR process, so I'll keep that in mind. I'm more than happy to promote this article. ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 10:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]