Talk:Remote Shell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category: Unix Shells?

Can you really call rsh a Unix Shell? It's not a Unix Shell in the sense that bash or zsh are Unix Shells, it's a communication tool for logging in to a machine or executing a command over a network. rsh doesn't interpret the commands you send, it simply sends them over and the command shell on the remote system interprets them...

Possible Spam[edit]

The KontrolPack link seems to be spam. But it's been there for years. Has it been taken over, or was it always spam? 192.203.187.55 (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "rexec has the same kind of functionality that rsh has : you can execute shell commands on a remote computer. The main difference is that rexecd authenticates by reading the username and password (unencrypted) from the socket." and nothing else. I think we can safely merge those two stubs together. Not that any has a strong case to pass WP:GNG, but... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin man page is dead, please refer to https://linux.die.net/man/1/rsh or a GNU manual entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.226.12.99 (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible merge with Shell shoveling?[edit]

Shell shoveling might be worth merging, please discuss. Holzklöppel (talk) 20:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]