Talk:Religious tolerance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Social studies[edit]

Example of religious tolerance 27.34.57.37 (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Social[edit]

Class 6 27.34.57.37 (talk) 12:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Religious tolerance[edit]

Talk 2400:1A00:B030:F31:F4E1:D189:A6CA:8540 (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The text is somehow wrong![edit]

Wow, I stumbled upon this article and was really surprised: What a strange definition of a term! 'Religious toleration may signify "no more than forbearance..."'. I thought wikipedia articles should start with a proper neutral point of view definition. The very first line of the article is more like criticism and the use of words 'may signify' expresses uncertainity and "consequences" while there should be at least one sentence about the term as such. The first lines of the article should go (maybe) somewhere in the middle under 'criticism' or something like that. I'm not an experienced wikipedian, but I seriously think there is something very wrong with this article. Can some more experienced user take a look at it, please? 2A00:1028:96D5:9536:8941:7BF0:474C:A490 (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is Wikipedia allowing propaganda and lying? Unbelievably wrongful article. This is absurdity.
This article Should NOT be up here without continuous reviews and adaquate professional reviewers. 2A00:A041:2CA0:7200:B5E4:7557:47E9:8511 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]