Talk:Regent Square (Pittsburgh)

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article scope[edit]

Regent Square User was a long time resident and was trying to clarify the map confusion. My sources were cited within the talk page which is the Regent Square Civic Association and at the end of the talk. I apologize for the confusion. But I also lived in Regent Square and thought the article calling residents confused is innaccurate. As a long time resident I do have first hand knowledge and know that at least I was never confused by our neighborhood boundaries. The article itself has some inaccuracies regarding the map referred to in the talk. www.regentsquare-rsca.org is the website for the Regent Square Civic Association and would be the most accurate and reliable source to clarify any potential innaccuracies within the article. Please visit their website to confirm what I am writing is accurate. I realize this talk is probably not suitable either but wanted to explain the talk as well as confirm that I am a novice when it comes editing. --Regent Square Resident (talk) 06:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Regent Square left some comments about this article and its scope at their talk page. Personally I'd say that sounds like original research unsuitable to Wikipedia, not supported by reliable sources Unfortunately that's a problem the content of the article already suffers. I may decide to shorten it to remove unsourced and dubious claims. Huon (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]