Talk:Red River Valley

Canada: Manitoba / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Dakota Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as High-importance).

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The assertion that the song relates to the Red River of the South disagrees with the Wikipedia article regarding the song. It is generally accepted that the song's lyrics are of Canadian origin and that they do relate to the Red River of the North.GothmogLOB (talk) 21:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

This article is peppered with "citation needed" tags and a lack of references. I will attempt to address these as soon as possible. Otr500 (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a note, in case someone should read, a reference tag at the top of an article, or an appropriate section reference tag would suffice in lieu of a tag at the top and a bunch of "citation needed" tags adorning the article. An example would be the three paragraph U.S. geographical importance section with 4 "citation needed" tags. One tag follows "... these lands had previously been under the control of Great Britain.", that is preceded by an inline link to the Treaty of 1818 which does provide reference to the content.

The point is that citations are necessary and important. An article tagged then redundantly blanket tagged actually serves no purpose. The information is accurate but I suppose I could put 10 or 15 references in the section which will then be over-kill the other direction. I see there are editors that like to place reference and citation needed tags but apparently not as many that actually go a step farther and provide some.
A single section tag provides a better choice. Otr500 (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I provided references even for the tagged inline links that was somewhat baffling. I couldn't find the exact reference I was looking for concerning one edit so I blanked it for now. Otr500 (talk) 18:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Red River Valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061002174949/http://www.riverwatchonline.org/history/Dakota%20Portraits_10_02.html to http://www.riverwatchonline.org/history/Dakota%20Portraits_10_02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drainage basin map[edit]

What's with the area entirely surrounded by the drainage basin that isn't part of it? There aren't any endorheics there, and it can't magically drain somewhere else.—blindlynx 17:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is that the map you're talking about?That looks like Devils Lake (North Dakota). Masterhatch (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ahh cool—blindlynx 19:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]