Talk:Raymond Luczak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

You guys did a great job gathering all of the correct information that readers will find enjoyable. I noticed a few grammatical errors, but those can be easily fixed with a quick re-reading of your work. I'm glad you guys were able to find a lot of information about your poet because my partner and I have been having trouble looking up the background information on our poet. The only thing I would recommend is to cite which articles you used for the first two sections of your page.


Hi there!

Your sandbox is really well done! I have a couple of notes that would make this article better. I noticed that you put Raymond Luczak's works in but didn't say when they were published. I think that if you listed his works in chronological order, it would look a lot better. The other thing that I noticed was that in the "Legacy" section, you put what he is doing as of now too. I don't know if you would want to do this, but maybe naming the section "Career and Legacy" or something similar to that, it would seem like he is still focusing on his career and building his legacy.

I really liked reading about his background that you wrote about! The poet that my partners and I are researching seems to be a very "private" person because there really isn't much about his personal life or early life. I also liked the way you formated your references. It looks great so far!

Agsimeone (talk) 20:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the information you provided for your article was great! It was a good amount of information about your poet and nothing ever seemed like too much or anything that dragged on which was good! There also wasn't anything that would try to convince or persuade the reader to think any certain way towards the poet which is also a good thing! The only minor things I saw were the missing lead which I'm sure you can add easily as well as a photo but that shouldn't be the biggest deal either. One thing I would maybe add are citations around some of the information provided, like for the "early life and education" and for the "works" just so a reader can know where some of that information was found but other than that this really has a good foundation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelreyna (talkcontribs) 20:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I like how each work listed on the draft has a short description of what it is about. I also enjoy how detailed the "Early Life and Education" section is. The part I liked the most was the one titled "Legacy" because of the background information we are able to read up on. In terms of any changes I suggest, I think this article should have more links in it so that we can see the references you are speaking on. This would be an improvement so that if a reader is confused or wants to know more, they can press the link and do more research. This is something my group might also have to incorporate more of into our article. I think for the most part, just add the links and finishing touches to your article such as the "lead" and it should be great!

  -Jailene P.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janedoe3399 (talkcontribs) 20:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Adrianabuen, JStanfieldIII, LuisAlonsoxy. Peer reviewers: Janedoe3399, Michaelreyna, Brianna171, Agsimeone.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]