The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
It is absurd PoV to have half of an entry about this book devoted to the criticisms of a small and extreme Islamist group. The IHRC's criticisms amount to holocaust denial, and attempt to identify a clerical-fascist regime with all the world's Muslims. In both respects it is offensive as well as inappropriate.
I don't even think that the book itself really merits an article. If you look at previous versions, they were pretty promotional. I believe I have neutralized it, and part of this was adding criticism a from significant organization. I've tried to be fair by including the official lines on the book and the description given by its detractors. While you may understandably dislike the IHRC, your personal opinion does not have any bearing on the pertinence of their criticism to this article. I believe that what is written is enough for a rather insignificant book, and I think that adding more in one direction or the other would amount to promotion or smearing, respectively. Thanks, and feel free to ask more questions if something still bothers you. The Behnam 00:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}