Talk:Quibble (plot device)

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2020 and 12 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tzaher.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inversion[edit]

This strikes me as not a quibble and not noteworthy in itself. Goldfritha 01:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it can be well worth while to describe the inversion of a trope along with the trope itself. I think the example I gave was a nice example of inverting the quibble and should go back in. Does anbody have any input? (The section in question is reproduced below).

I also feel that the article is any case a somewhat random list of examples, that may need editing. I may be somewhat biased but I don't seee that an Iain Banks example is any less noteworthy than a Piers Anthony example.

Iain Banks cleverly inverts the quibble in Excession in the following way -We are greatly outnumbered -I will not surrender -Well I'm going to surrender -But x swore you would obey us -And I have, within reason -But x didn't say anthing about 'within reason' -Well I think one always just takes that sort of proviso for granted, anyway I have transmitted the request for surrender. ChristineD 23:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an example of a quibble. Why include it? Goldfritha 00:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like TV Tropes[edit]

This article reads as if it was TV Tropes instead of Wikipedia. ;) Homei (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs pictures[edit]

This article needs a picture of a quibble. I do not know what quibbles look like.

Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 00:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As an entirely abstract concept, a quibble cannot be photographed and does not lend itself to depiction. You might have been thinking of a tribble, however. :) --Florian Blaschke (talk) 12:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]