Talk:Quercus robur

Cultivar Photos[edit]

Does anyone have photos of the cultivars not shown ('Filicifolia' & 'Purpurea' )?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.179.102.158 (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The common name of the Commmon oak[edit]

It is usually called the common oak in Britain. I've just put this name back in for the third time. Imc 21:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not true. The usual common name here is English Oak, with Pedunculate Oak mainly used in botanical texts. The name "Common Oak" is, at best, very rarely used. - MPF 01:02, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any evidence it is called teh "German Oak" in English. I can't find it Billlion (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Oak: symbolism and identification[edit]

Although one might expect the Royal Oak to be an "English Oak", I'm pretty sure it isn't. I've taken a few photos of the fruits and leaves of the Tercentenary Oak and the one planted for Victoria's diamond jubilee, both daughter trees at Boscobel: you can no longer get close enough to the Royal Oak itself. Both appear to be Sessile Oaks to me, with characteristic short-stalked leaves and stalkless acorns. Moreover, all the oaks in the vicinity seem to be Sessile too. I'll put a photo in the gallery for discussion, because I may well be wrong, and there's a chance these are hybrids, I suppose. I'd be grateful for comments from those more expert. I'd like to identify the Royal Oak with more certainty. Sjwells53 (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mention it being a Final £1 million question on WWTBAM?[edit]

Link here, Second successful million pound question in British Millionare history. Dunno where to add, New Trivia Section? 82.21.53.146 23:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Provide Information on Growth Rates[edit]

Could someone add information on oak growth rates - there is obviously information on maximum dimensions, but nothing on growth rates (and this is hard to track down). Growth speed is key practical information when planting new trees, and estimating age of existing examples. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.98.76.45 (talk) 13:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Growth rate of oak trees as for any trees is differing very much. Investigations in Latvia show that in 50 years time one oak-tree has reached 3,6 metres circumference, while others having 370 year age have nt reached 5 metre girth.--Daarznieks (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

"both pruning techniques that extend the tree's potential lifespan, if not its health". Does this mean that the techniques adversely affect the trees' health? The "if not" construction should be avoided. --Wetman 14:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mis-spelling of Latin binomial[edit]

I've found several mis-spellings of "robur" on the internet - including on the RSPB's site! Would anyone object to me setting up redirect pages for "Quercus rober" and "Quercus robor" ? Dom Kaos (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously nobody minds, so I'll go ahead Dom Kaos (talk) 20:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Age of Stelmuze oak[edit]

There is no scientific evidence that Stelmuze oak tree in Lithuania is 1500 years old - this is just a tale of tourist guides kept alive since the popular tradition of late 19th century to describe the size of trees just with imaginary age of trees. Experience of historical documents from Latvian trees (which grow in similar, a bit more harsh conditions) show that even the most giant oak trees exceedng the size of Stelmuze oak do not have more than 450 years age. In sites of paganic rituals in place of deceased sacred tree there always was planted a new one - thus also the fact that the tree is mentioned in old chronicles does not mean much. Where is evidence that this separate tree is three times older than other oak trees of similar size in our region? --Daarznieks (talk) 16:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Australian Example[edit]

Added info about the largest Australian example, tourist attraction in Donnybrook, Western Australia.Printpost (talk) 03:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

English Oak - from Thomé, Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 1885.
Flowers
Fastigiate English Oak Quercus robur 'Fastigiata', Knightshayes Court.
Golden English Oak Quercus robur 'Concordia', Wilton House.
Weeping English Oak Quercus robur 'Pendula', Hillersdon House.
Crooked branches of Quercus robur, Serbia.
Large penduculate oak, Serbia.
Quercus robur f. fastigiata
The oldest pedunculate oak of the Benelux - Éghezée (Belgium)
The oldest tree in the Baltic states - the Stelmužė Oak, Lithuania
'Fastigiata' Bark in detail
'Fastigiata' Leaf clusters in a tree
Kindred Spirit Hybrid Oak(Q. robur fastigiata x Q. bicolor)
Cola-nut gall on Q.robur
Red-pea gall or Red Currant gall on Q.robur
A pine tree growing on an ancient Cadzow pedunculate oak.
Q. robur beside the laboratory at RHS Garden, Wisley
An oak near Vrena village in Sudermania, Sweden, used as a pattern for a family tree
Boscobel - acorns of the Tercentenary Oak, planted in 1651 to commemorate the escape of Charles II after the Battle of Worcester. Pedunculate or sessile?
Boscobel - Acorns of the oak planted in 1897 to commemorate the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria. Like the Tercentenary oak, this is reliably attested a daughter of the Royal Oak. But is it pedunculate or sessile?

Images moved here from a gallery section in the article. Section was entirely too large for the article. Feel free to move one or two back to the article. Let's not over do it, eh? --Rkitko ^(talk) 00:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latvia section of Symbolism[edit]

This clearly needs rewriting by someone who knows the subject. I've looked through the history and people keep tagging it for tone, weasel words and lack of citation but the tags are removed without the article being rewritten. If someone can rewrite it? If not, I'll come back and delete it as it is poorly written and completely unverified.

Jwrstewart (talk) 00:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right, no one has come forwards so it's about time it went.

Jwrstewart (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2012 (GMT)

Older Latin names[edit]

I am sure I remember it used to be called Quercus pedunculata. This website says synonims include that and Quercus longaeva [1]. How is it best to include historical Latin names? I am no expert on history of taxonomy, just old enough to know Latin names changed since I was a child! Billlion (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Quercus robur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quercus robur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820065524/http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/plants/trees/turnersoak.html to http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/plants/trees/turnersoak.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hnb.hr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Culture section[edit]

There's quite a lot of material in the culture section here, but is it specific to pedunculate oak, or should it be in the genus article? There's quite a lot of overlap between the two articles already. Also, it's quite poorly referenced, and I'm not sure it's a good idea to transfer it across wholesale.E Wusk (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]