Talk:Queen's Anniversary Prizes

Remove copyright violation

Regrettably most of the text was a direct steal of the official website, so I have removed it. Anyone like to reconstruct the information? Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

List of prizewinners

Format of table

I was thinking to list all prizewinners in tables. I do not know how many winning entities there have been, but I think it is 20-25 at each ceremony and there have been 8 ceremonies I think. I was going to organize this by year, but in separate tables in separate sections, but another way this could be done is to put everything in one table so that people could use the automatic Wikipedia table sorting function to arrange all entries by year or category. I started on this already. Any opinions from anyone? Blue Rasberry 16:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

References

References are going to be rough for any list of prizewinners because each entry does not have its own page on the Royal Anniversary Trust website. For me to provide references I would have to link through a search function which could change, and I do not see the point of this. I was thinking to leave off references in most cases. Any winner can be verified easy through the Trust website, and many winners can be verified in their own press releases by searching Google, but if I were to list all 100+ winners I do not think I would be up for finding and formatting either 100 different references through the RAT website when I think they would rot or the same number from as many different websites. If someone did want to put references in, they could easily go into the rationale column of the table. Blue Rasberry 16:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Additonal ref

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/queens-universitys-award-for-pioneering-work-in-cyber-security

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Queen's Anniversary Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.env.ic.ac.uk/ICCET
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101130195310/http://www.lboro.ac.uk:80/departments/el/programmes/systems/ to http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/el/programmes/systems
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050912023719/http://www.lutonsfc.ac.uk:80/lsfcweb/ to http://www.lutonsfc.ac.uk/lsfcweb
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061106062713/http://www.hhrc.rca.ac.uk:80/programmes/designage/index.html to http://www.hhrc.rca.ac.uk/programmes/designage/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)