Talk:Quatuor Coronati Lodge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Is there anything more that can be said?[edit]

Or is this going to be a permanent stub? Blueboar 17:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there somewhere it could merge to? - Crosbiesmith 18:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a source for the history of the lodge, the reasons for origination and the like that would be useful. As far as notability is concerned, it was the first of the historically robust research lodges, formed in part as a consequence of the flights of fancy related to origin theories of the craft. Of course that accuracy leads to what we have now, the producer of turgid biographies rather than interesting analysis of the development of speculative thinking in the operative framework.

The notability is perhaps debatable, remembering that the SRRS article was AFDd on that basis.

In the spirit of open-ness I'm a member of both QCCC and SRRS.

ALR 18:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is definitely notable in Masonic circles... whether that translates to WP:NOTE is another issue. I agree that it would be good to go into some of the history and the reasons for its founding etc. Blueboar 19:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Independent source needed[edit]

We need to cite an independent source or two (something other than the QCCC website) to establish notability... I will check to see if it is discussed in Hodapp's "for Dummies" book or Morris's "Idiot's guide"... but we should also look for other sources that are even better. Blueboar (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]