Talk:Psychic archaeology

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Precognition#In dreams|Precognitive dreaming]] The anchor (#In dreams) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Psychic archaeology[edit]

I think you've done a nice job with this entry so far. However, please look at the changes that I made to the first couple of paragraphs. I've added several additional links as well as some text on skepticism to try and make the entry more balanced. You may even want to include a new section providing links to critiques of psychic archaeology (with citations) beyond just Williams. Remember, the goal here is to construct an entry that is neutral in overall tone and content yet balanced in accurately representing multiple points-of-view. As a general comment, I think you could include some additional references. You may also get some additional ideas by looking at entries for other kinds of psychic activities, such as the phenomenon of the psychic detective. Another section to begin--but don't go crazy with this--would be something like "Psychic archaeology in fiction" or "Psychic archaeology in film", with links to examples of how psychic archaeology appears in popular culture. You might also expand your list of archaeological sites that have attracted applications of psychic archaeology, including the Great Sphinx of Giza and Palenque. I have a feeling this entry will grow over time! Hoopes (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Dougweller (talk) has put some specific comments about your article on his talk page. Scroll down to the section titled Student Editors at KU. Hoopes (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to update the page, add criticism if necessary and suggestions are welcome.Alatanar