Talk:Proto–Three Kingdoms period

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Inconsistent dates[edit]

There is a serious problem here. The text says, "Generally considered the first three centuries of the Common Era,...," whereas the time-line used here and generally in Korean history articles says

Proto-Three Kingdoms: 108–57 BC

Buyeo, Okjeo, Dongye
Samhan: Ma, Byeon, Jin

Kdammers (talk) 00:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent page move[edit]

I think the article should not have been moved. As "proto-" is a prefix and not an independent word, shouldn't it be hyphnated rather than endashed per WP:ENDASH? It says "An en dash is not used ... with an element that lacks lexical independence (the prefix Sino- in Sino-Japanese trade)". --Kusunose 00:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the rest of ENDASH. A prefix to an open compound (but not a hyphenated compound) is dashed, as in "post–World War II". — kwami (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed that part. Thank you for the explanation. --Kusunose 02:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Deor is quite correct, so it seems the proposer just did not read MOS:ENDASH carefully enough. Andrewa (talk) 02:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proto–Three Kingdoms of Korea → Proto-Three Kingdoms of Korea – 'Proto-' is a prefix. You do not use an en dash here. 14.200.68.118 (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 14.200.68.118 (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. MOS:ENDASH says that an en dash is used "instead of a hyphen, when applying a prefix (but not a suffix) to a compound that includes a space". In this case, the prefix proto- is being applied to the compound "Three Kingdoms", not just to three. The situation is exactly parallel to the "pre–World War II" example given in the MOS. Deor (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Proto–Three Kingdoms of Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date range?[edit]

Can we make the date range for this period more obvious in the lead? toobigtokale (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]