Talk:Prochlorococcus

Algae Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 February 2022 and 25 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbdull (article contribs).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raaghul1698, Sophiakim56.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Atmospheric oxygen[edit]

I think the statement that Prochlorococcus is responsible for at least 50% of atmospheric oxygen is dubious. What does that mean? That it created half of the oxygen in the atmosphere back when the atmosphere got its oxygen? It may be true that it produces half of the oxygen that is presently being produced by plants and algae, but that's not the same thing. (By the way, if all the Prochlorococcus died, we'd still have our oxygen, and it wouldn't go down much at all. When Prochlorococcus dies or gets eaten, this consumes the oxygen that it produced during its life.) Eric Kvaalen (talk) 12:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Eric Kvaalen. According to Field et al (1998)</http://www.sciencemag.org/content/281/5374/237> approximately 50% of global net primary production (and therefore oxygen production) is attributed to oceanic production and phytoplankton, which is in turn divided among all phytoplankton groups, not just Prochlorococcus. I've heard estimates that Prochlorococcus is responsible for about 50% of marine primary production, but I don't have a legitimate source for that right now, and it would probably be disputed anyways. In any case, the statement that Prochlorococcus is responsible for 50% of global oxygen production is incorrect and should be deleted. Alimardo (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm a bit late to the game on this, but I'm a PhD student that has been tasked with editing this article for my Microbial Ecology course. Can anyone make any suggestions for places you know this article could use some work? I've found a few more updated articles, as I see this hasn't been edited since 2017. I may be able to help with the portion about atmospheric oxygen, but I agree with the rhetoric that it isn't 100% accurate. Prochlorococcus could be considered a contributor to atmospheric oxygen, but it's not the main player. Please let me know! Any suggestions are good ones. --Cbdull (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prochlorococcus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041211182136/http://web.mit.edu:80/mbsulli/www/Rocap-etal-2003.pdf to http://web.mit.edu/mbsulli/www/Rocap-etal-2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image available[edit]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/prochlorococcus/33750887441/ is CC0. 66.30.115.60 (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]