Talk:Potential game

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Potential game article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Game theory Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in \| Fix a red link \| Add content \| Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

The results in bounded rational potential games go back to 2005. The paper "Gibbsian approach..." has been cited many times (see researchgate). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:772A:E580:9184:6E6F:3252:F8EA (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not take down the bounded rational section - you clearly do not understand the history of "citations needed" in other articles (namely econophysics) that required this section here. Topics in econophysics are critically linked to potential games, and the background is necessary here. Please understand the history and content of the development of the econophysics article before altering this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:772A:E580:9184:6E6F:3252:F8EA (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User who took out Bounded Rational section has issues with wikipedia administration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Attic_Salt#Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_closure_of_RfC_by_involved_editor_.2B_alteration_of_others.27_talk_page_comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:772A:E580:9184:6E6F:3252:F8EA (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justification of lambda parameter in quantal response equilibrium requires bounded rational potential games. The article also links to this to justify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.94.252 (talk) 22:46, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is perhaps relevant in the quantal response equilibrium (although the papers you link are so non-notable that they aren't relevant anywhere). This page is about potential games, not a single application of their use that happens to involve citing a bunch of papers you really like, which all coincedentally are written by two authors and haven't been cited by anyone other than those two authors. WeakTrain (talk) 08:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

explain notation[edit]

Is there a Wikipedia article that explains the notation ${a_{-i}}$ ?

Jmichael ll (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]