Talk:Port of Dover

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

Article needs a picture -- Antriver 21:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look at de:Hafen von Dover. --213.155.224.232 11:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a lot more history, elizabethan tidal port, wooden harbour, and roman quay etc. 82.6.185.141 12:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Port of Dover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Stack[edit]

This appears to be disaster management related to the Port of Dover; Operation Stack.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnsoniensis, with no sudden accident, natural catastrophe, or anything else that caused great damage or loss of life, I find it hard to consider this freight backlog, caused by the closure of French ports, as a disaster. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I shall not object; I thought disaster management was concerned with planning so that some disasters do not happen. Obviously the present state of the cross Channel freight services has not become a disaster. Unfortunately once it occurs it stays around for a long time. Brexit has a lot of problems. --Johnsoniensis (talk) 17:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnsoniensis, this wasn't a disaster though, just congestion caused by France being closed. And this was not related to Brexit, it was the reaction of French to the level of the new Covid variant in the UK. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is a sensible way of looking at it but it seems to me that Operation Stack is resorted to when a real disaster like a fire or flood in the Channel Tunnel arises. If a military force attacked a port that would also be a disaster of national significance. (I am not a member of these projects but any better-informed editor is free to revise the WikiProjects attached to an article.)-- --Johnsoniensis (talk) 22:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnsoniensis, it's there to accommodate all the trucks that accumulate if the crossing(s) are blocked for any reason. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]