Talk:Port Sanilac Light

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

categories[edit]

I think it is properly categorized. Please remove that tag.7&6=thirteen (talk) 03:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Picture needed[edit]

This article would greatly benefit from a picture of this unique lighthouse. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

History needed[edit]

I've put in lots of references and external links. We need someone else to glean a history (with appropriate references) from that material, presumably. This article is short in that department. Compare the Terry Pepper article and see for yourself. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Question[edit]

Does the fourth order Fresnel lens and light beam have a range of 13 miles, or 16 miles? The article currently uses both numbers. This is significant because of the light's range was 16 miles in all directions, then it could have completely closed the 30-mile darkness gap along the shore of Michigan's Thumb that was the reason for the light's construction. Bigturtle (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Port Sanilac Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]