Talk:Pomacentridae
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
New Edit[edit]
Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I added a hyperlink for Amphiprion ocellaris into your article. I am a part of a Behavioral Ecology Class (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_Program:Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Behavioral_Ecology_%28Fall_2013%29) Washington University and our assignment was to create hyperlinks from our articles to other articles as examples. Best of luck with your article!! Gseehra123 (talk) 22:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pomacentridae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721153207/http://plazi.org:8080/dspace/bitstream/10199/15417/6/zt01671p031.pdf to http://plazi.org:8080/dspace/bitstream/10199/15417/6/zt01671p031.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Broken ref[edit]
@Quetzal1964: you've left an undefined ref named "VDLEF" on the page. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fyrael Fixed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Proposal to merge Damselfish into Pomacentridae[edit]
The only thing that makes the damselfish article unique is that it excludes clownfish, but I'm not sure if that's a good reason to have two separate articles. All the info on that article could be added to Pomacentridae instead, since there's not too much on here aside from taxonomy and a bit of life history info. Perhaps the page name could also be changed to Damselfish. Geekgecko (talk) 19:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. The clownfish is a unique group that should not be 'included' in damselfish. The little bit of life history and taxonomy can potentially confuse readers. Take it in the mind of somebody who bought a damselfish. They don't realize they've been redirected to Pomacentridae when they searched 'damselfish' for care instructions. They scroll very quickly and see 'mutual relationships with anemones' while ignoring the part that say 'clownfish have' (I think I would add those; almost 100% of Pomacentridae is about damselfish not clownfish). They put a large anemone in their tank and their damselfish get stung. This would anger new fish keepers and other novice readers. For this reason I think two separate articles for damselfish, clownfish, and Pomacentridae. Jj1691 (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)