Talk:Polyamines in plant stress
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jl2892. Peer reviewers: Mmesoma Okafor.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Mmesoma's peer review for Juho Lim[edit]
Based on what I have read so far, everything in the article is relevant to the article topic and you have not deviated from the main point. However, I have been a little distracted by some sentence structure and that only a few sources have been used to gather the information. The article is neutral and does not make any claims aside from those gotten in the research paper. I like the lead section information because it gives me a general idea of what to expect and I saw that some of the info there was similar to those being talked about in the remaining article, so it is a good sign that the rest of the article will follow through with the lead. Because there is not as much information, I am not able to judge overrepresentation but the information in each section is equally sized. Only one out of the five citation links allow me to click through to the research paper it is attached to, I would suggest rewatching the training video to find out how to link the papers in the reference section in such a way that anyone who comes on the page can easily click to find it rather than having to copy and paste it. A concern that I have is that there are more papers in the reference section than are linked in the actual article, maybe you're planning to include information from those other papers later? or put the in-text tags later on? I am also wondering if the information that you presented in some areas such as the "Difficulty in Research" section is just your opinion or it was information in one of those papers and if so, it should be linked to a source/tell us where the information is coming from. Some of the words used in the article such as "embryonic diapause", "phytochelatin" and some others could be hyperlinked to allow readers who do not know what they mean to click on them and find what the words mean before continuing with your paper. Aside from that, good job so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmesoma Okafor (talk • contribs) 02:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)